Back to blog

Pros & Cons: Red Light Therapy

Photobiomodulation (PBM), better known in the wellness world as “red light therapy”, is a simple idea with a surprisingly technical implementation: deliver carefully selected red and/or near‑infrared (NIR) wavelengths to tissue, at doses low enough to avoid meaningful heating, yet high enough to provoke measurable biological responses.

The research base is real and expanding.[1] The marketing, unsurprisingly, is also expanding. The practical truth sits in between: PBM can be useful for specific goals, but outcomes are parameter‑dependent and shaped by wavelength, irradiance (power density), total dose, distance, and how often you use it.[2–4]

What “red” and “near‑infrared” actually mean

Most PBM devices used in clinical studies and consumer products cluster in two wavelength ranges:

  • Red light: ~630–660 nm

  • Near‑infrared (NIR): ~810–850 nm

Those ranges show up frequently in the literature, but they are not universal numbers. Different tissues, depths, and endpoints may respond differently.[1,3]

Red Light Therapy Pros

Skin appearance

Dermatology is one of PBM’s most studied frontiers.[1] Controlled clinical work shows PBM can improve some measures of skin appearance (for example, perceived smoothness and fine lines), and it has been investigated for collagen‑related outcomes.[1,6] Protocols vary across studies, which helps explain why results vary.[1] With consistent use, PBM can support healthier‑looking skin, with outcomes depending on the parameters used.[1,6]

Comfort and recovery

PBM has also been evaluated as a non‑pharmacological aid in pain and recovery research, including studies on conditions such as musculoskeletal pain (for example, neck pain and low back pain), knee osteoarthritis, and some tendinopathies.[2–4] Across the broader literature, PBM has also been studied in post-exercise recovery contexts (for example, muscle soreness and performance-related outcomes).[2–4] PBM may support comfort and recovery in some contexts, but it should not replace medical diagnosis or care.[2–4]

Sleep‑related outcomes

Sleep is a popular reason people try red light therapy, partly because red wavelengths are generally considered more “circadian friendly” than blue-rich light. Human action spectrum studies for melatonin suppression show peak sensitivity in the blue range (around ~460–480 nm), with much lower sensitivity at longer, red wavelengths.[13,14] That does not mean red light is “invisible” to the circadian system at any intensity, but it helps explain why red light is often used as a lower-circadian-impact option in the evening compared with brighter, blue-rich sources.[13,14]

When it comes to PBM devices specifically, the sleep evidence is still developing.[8,9] Some trials have investigated outcomes such as improvements in subjective sleep quality and melatonin-related measures.[9,15]

Red light is a more circadian-friendly choice than blue-rich light in the evening. Pair any light-based routine with well-supported basics like consistent sleep timing, bright morning light, and reducing bright/blue light exposure at night and your sleep will thank you.[8,9,13,14]

How to use a red light therapy device

Red Light Therapy Cons

Before embarking on your journey into red light therapy, it is important to assess the downsides. There can be negative effects and practical risks to consider.

Photosensitivity

Some people report irritated skin, warmth, redness, or temporary discomfort when using red light therapy, especially with reactive skin, photosensitizing medications, or aggressive topical regimens.[2–4] When you first get a device, make sure to do a simple light sensitivity test (short exposure, conservative distance) to see how your skin responds.

If you have a medical condition, are pregnant, take photosensitizing medications, have a history of skin cancer, or have concerns about eye health, seek medical advice before using light-based devices.[12]

Inefficient products (and misleading specs)

Not all red light therapy devices are created equal. “Red light therapy” is a category label, not a standardised protocol, and outcomes can depend heavily on wavelength, irradiance, dose, distance, and treatment schedule.[1,3] Choose products you can trust, with clear specifications and parameters.

Industry Standards

Many red light devices are not clearly tested against high-quality standards. If you are unsure, look for products that meet relevant industry standards. Some brands also do not register their red light devices with relevant regulators (for example, the FDA in the USA). Choose products from suppliers known to comply with applicable regulations and standards.

Non-standardised wavelengths and output

Clinical studies often focus on specific wavelength ranges (commonly ~630–660 nm and ~810–850 nm), but not every consumer device reliably delivers those wavelengths or the stated dose.[1,3] Devices from less reliable brands may emit different wavelengths, provide inconsistent output, or deliver lower-than-expected irradiance, which can affect results and reduce confidence in the protocol.[1,3]

Eye safety

Avoid direct eye exposure to bright sources and use protective eyewear per device instructions. PBM is studied in ophthalmology using purpose-built devices and protocols, which should not be confused with looking at a general home panel.[10,11]

Bottom Line

Always follow manufacturer instructions. PBM is dose‑sensitive, so “more” is not automatically “better.”[1,3] A conservative approach:

  1. Start low (short sessions, fewer days/week) and see how you respond.

  2. Pick a distance and keep it consistent (dose changes quickly with distance).

  3. Protect eyes (don’t stare into the light source).

  4. Be consistent, not extreme (steady beats intense).

PBM is highly parameter‑dependent, and the evidence varies by indication. The most reliable way to engage with it is measured expectations, transparent device specifications, and medical guidance when appropriate.

BON CHARGE: This content is for general education and is not medical advice. Our products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Always follow product instructions and consult a qualified healthcare professional for guidance tailored to you. Individual results may vary.

References

  1. Hernández-Bule ML, Naharro-Rodríguez J, Bacci S, Fernández-Guarino M. Unlocking the power of light on the skin: a comprehensive review on photobiomodulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:4483. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084483

  2. Son Y, Lee H, Yu S, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials. Syst Rev. 2025;14:160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02902-3

  3. González-Muñoz A, Cuevas-Cervera M, Pérez-Montilla JJ, et al. Efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy in the treatment of pain and inflammation: a literature review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:938. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11070938

  4. Ferreira LMA, Oliveira ABC, Mendes JJB, et al. Photobiomodulation in chronic pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Front Integr Neurosci. 2026;20:1717372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2026.1717372

  5. Quirk BJ, Whelan HT. What lies at the heart of photobiomodulation: light, cytochrome c oxidase, and nitric oxide—review of the evidence. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2020.4905

  6. Wunsch A, Matuschka K. A controlled trial to determine the efficacy of red and near-infrared light treatment in patient satisfaction, reduction of fine lines, wrinkles, skin roughness, and intradermal collagen density increase. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3616

  7. Armitage H. Red light therapy: what the science says. Stanford Medicine. 2025. https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2025/02/red-light-therapy-skin-hair-medical-clinics.html

  8. Jung J, Kim T. Photobiomodulation and its therapeutic potential in sleep disturbances. Sleep Med Res. 2024;15:218–227. https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2024.02593

  9. Pan R, Zhang G, Deng F, et al. Effects of red light on sleep and mood in healthy subjects and individuals with insomnia disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1200350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1200350

  10. Valter K, Tedford SE, Eells JT. Photobiomodulation use in ophthalmology: an overview of translational research from bench to bedside. Front Ophthalmol. 2024;4:1388602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1388602

  11. Garg D, Daigavane S. Photobiomodulation in ophthalmology: a comprehensive review of bench-to-bedside research and clinical integration. Cureus. 2024;16:e69651. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69651

  12. Paglioni MP, Araújo ALD, Arboleda LPA, et al. Tumor safety and side effects of photobiomodulation therapy used for prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2019;93:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.004

  13. Thapan K, Arendt J, Skene DJ. An action spectrum for melatonin suppression: evidence for a novel non-rod, non-cone photoreceptor system in humans. J Physiol. 2001;535:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.t01-1-00261.x

  14. Brainard GC, Hanifin JP, Greeson JM, et al. Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6405–6412. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06405.2001

  15. Zhao J, Tian Y, Nie J, et al. Red light and the sleep quality and endurance performance of Chinese female basketball players. J Athl Train. 2012;47:673–678. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-47.6.08

Back to blog

Latest Articles

1 3